Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willenheimer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Willenheimer, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

How to begin treatment in chronic heart failure? Results of CIBIS III

Ronnie Willenheimer*

Department of Cardiology, Lund University, University Hospital, S-205 02 Malmö, Sweden

* Corresponding author. Tel: +46 40 33 10 00; fax: +46 40 33 62 09. E-mail address: ronnie.willenheimer{at}med.lu.se

Aims To compare the effect of initial monotherapy with either bisoprolol or enalapril, followed by their combination, on mortality and hospitalization in patients with mild-to-moderate CHF.

Methods and results One thousand and ten patients with mild-to-moderate CHF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, without ACE-inhibitor, beta-blocker, or angiotensin-receptor-blocker therapy were randomized to open-label monotherapy with either bisoprolol (target dose 10 mg od, n=505) or enalapril (target dose 10 mg bid, n=505) for 6 months, followed by their combination for 6–24 months. The combined primary endpoint was all-cause mortality or hospitalization; bisoprolol-first was considered non-inferior to enalapril-first if the upper limit of the 95% CI for the absolute between-group difference was below +5%, corresponding to HR 1.17. In the intention-to-treat population, the primary endpoint occurred in 178 patients allocated bisoprolol-first vs. 186 allocated enalapril-first: absolute difference, –1.6%; 95% CI, –7.6 to +4.4%; HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.77–1.16. Thus, non-inferiority was demonstrated in the intention-to-treat population. In the per-protocol population, the primary endpoint occurred in 163 patients in the bisoprolol-first group vs. 165 in the enalapril-first group: absolute difference, –0.7%; 95% CI, –6.6 to +5.1%; HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.78–1.21. With bisoprolol-first, 65 patients died vs. 73 with enalapril-first (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.63–1.22; between-group difference P=0.44), and 151 vs. 157 patients were hospitalized (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.76–1.19; between-group difference P=0.66). Post hoc analysis of data from the first year indicated that a bisoprolol-first strategy reduced mortality by 31%, compared with an enalapril-first strategy (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.46–1.02; between-group difference P=0.065).

Conclusion Initiating treatment with bisoprolol is as effective and well-tolerated as initiating treatment with enalapril. Post hoc analysis suggests that starting treatment with bisoprolol may reduce the risk of death, especially in the first year of treatment.

Key Words: Congestive heart failure • Therapy • Beta-blocker • Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor • Sequence of drug initiation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.