Foreword
a Oslo, Norway
b Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.
References
- Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285:24862497
[Free Full Text] - EUROASPIRE II Study Group. Lifestyle and risk factor management and use of drug therapies in coronary patients from 15 countries. Principal results from EUROASPIRE II Euro Heart Survey Programme. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:554572
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Pearson TA, Laurora I, Chu H, Kafonek S. The lipid Treatment Assessment Project (L-TAP): a multicenter survey to evaluate the percentages of dyslipidemic patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy and achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:459467
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:722[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Walldius G, Jungner I, Holme I, et al. High apolipoprotein B, low apolipoprotein A-I, and improvement in the prediction of fatal myocardial infarction (AMORIS study): a prospective study. Lancet. 2001;358:20262033[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Gotto AM Jr., Whitney E, Stein EA, et al. Relation between baseline and on-treatment lipid parameters and first acute major coronary events in the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS). Circulation. 2000;101:477484
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Luc G, Bard J-M, Ferrières J, et al. Value of HDL-C, apolipoprotein A-I, lipoprotein A-I, and lipoprotein A-I/A-II in prediction of coronary heart disease. The PRIME Study. Prospective Epidemiological Study of Myocardial Infarction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22:11551161
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Simes RJ, Marschner IC, Hunt D, et al. Relationship between lipid levels and clinical outcomes in the Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) Trial. To what extent is the reduction in coronary events with pravastatin explained by on-study lipid levels? Circulation. 2002;105:11621169
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Wiklund O, Davidson M, Chitra R, Hutchinson H, Raza A. Rosuvastatin is more effective than atorvastatin in modifying lipid profiles and achieving National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III LDL-cholesterol goals. Atherosclerosis Suppl. 2002;3:237[CrossRef]
- Barter P, Shepherd J, Brown WV, Bays H, Southworth H, Strutt K. Rosuvastatin significantly improves lipid parameters and ability to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals compared with pravastatin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(suppl B):142B
- Hamilton-Craig I, Schaefer E, Farnier M, Koren M, Southworth H, Pears J. Rosuvastatin produces significantly greater reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and more patients achieve treatment goals compared with simvastatin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(suppl B):146B
- Olsson AG, Istad H, Luurila O, et alRosuvastatin Investigators Group. Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin compared over 52 weeks of treatment in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Am Heart J. 2002;144:10441051[CrossRef][Medline]
- Brown WV, Bays HE, Hassman DR, et alRosuvastatin Study Group. Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin compared with pravastatin and simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: a randomised, double-blind, 52-week trial. Am Heart J. 2002;144:10361043[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Schneck DW, Knopp RH, Ballantyne CM, McPherson R, Chitra RR, Simonson SG. Comparative effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin across their dose ranges in patients with hypercholesterolemia and without active arterial disease. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:3341
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||