Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hohnloser, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Halperin, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hohnloser, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Halperin, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: current strategies and future directions

Stefan H. Hohnloser1,*, Gabor Z. Duray1, Usman Baber2 and Jonathan L. Halperin2

1 Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, J.W. Goethe University, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
2 Mount Sinai Medical Center, The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA

* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 69 6301 7404; fax: +49 69 6301 7017. E-mail address: hohnloser{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de

The morbidity and mortality associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) are related mainly to ischaemic stroke, and the prevention of thrombo-embolism is an important component of the patient management. The choice of optimum antithrombotic therapy for a given patient depends on the risk of thrombo-embolism, and the assessment of thrombo-embolic risk using validated stratification schemes, such as the CHADS2 score, is a critical step. Improved stratification schemes are needed that take into account the risk of intracerebral haemorrhage, which is the most worrisome complication of anticoagulant therapy. The pattern of AF (paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent) should not influence the selection of antithrombotic treatment. Similarly, successful rhythm control is not a sound basis for withdrawing antithrombotic treatment, and whether this situation differs after successful catheter ablation of AF has not been established. At present, oral vitamin K antagonists alone are recommended for patients with AF at moderate-to-high risk of stroke. A combination of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs is necessary in patients with AF undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and stent implantation, but the optimal therapeutic management of these patients has not been defined. The development of new antithrombotic agents that are easier to use and have a superior benefit-to-risk ratio will extend treatment to a greater proportion of the AF population at risk. The large number of phase III trials currently investigating specific inhibitors of thrombin or factor Xa that do not require laboratory monitoring suggests that this goal is within reach.

Key Words: Aspirin • Atrial fibrillation • Stroke • Thrombo-embolism • Vitamin K antagonists • Warfarin


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.