Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weber, M.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Weber, M.A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Angiotensin receptor blockers and the cardiovascular continuum: what future is indicated by recent successes?

M.A. Weber*

SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, New York, U.S.A.

* M. Weber, SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, New York, NY 11203, U.S.A.

Abstract

This editorial summarizes insights expressed at a recent symposium on angiotensin receptor blockers that is now published in this supplement. After a series of seminal trials in 2001 and 2002 in patients with such conditions as type 2 diabetes and renal insufficiency, heart-failure and hypertension with left-ventricular hypertrophy, we have evidence that these agents confer blood-pressure independent protective effects across the cardiovascular and renal continuum. Even so, blood-pressure control remains a key target of treatment and improving treatment compliance is a further priority. Forthcoming clinical trials with angiotensin receptor blockers in post-myocardial infarction patients and in high risk hypertension should give additional guidance in optimizing cardiovascular protection and prognosis.

Key Words: Cardiovascular protection • diabetes • heart failure • myocardial infarction

References

  1. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:851–860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Viberti G, Wheeldon NM, MARVAL study investigators. Microalbuminuria reduction with valsartain in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A blood pressure independent effect. Circulation. 2002;106:672–678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Parving H-H, Lehnert H, Brochner-Mortensen J, et al. The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:870–878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:861–869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Dahlöf B, Devereux R, Kjeldsen S, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002;359:995–1003[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Cohn JN, Tognoni G, Valsartan Heart Failure Trial Investigators. A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chornic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1667–1675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Dzau V, Braunwald E. Resolved and unresolved issues in the prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease: a workshop consensus statement. Am Heart J. 1991;121:1244–1263[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Pitt B, Segal R, Martinez FA, et al. Randomised trial of losartan versus captopril in patients over 65 with heart failure (Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly Study, ELITE). Lancet. 1997;349:747–752[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Pitt B, Poole-Wilson PA, Segal R, et al. Effect of losartan compared with captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: randomised trial — the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study LITE II. Lancet. 2000;355:1582–1587[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Dickstein K, Kjekshus Jthe OPTIMAAL Steering Committee for the OPTIMAAL Study Group. Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360:752–760[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Mann J, Julius S. The Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial of cardiovascular events in hypertension. Rationale and design. Blood Press. 1998;7:176–183[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Pfeffer MA, McMurray J, Leizorovicz A, et al. Valsartan in acute myocardial infarction trial (VALIANT): rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2000;140:727–750[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Haffner S, Holman R, Califf R, et al. Targeting post-prandial hyperglycemia to prevent type 2 diabetes: Rationale and design of the NAVIGATOR trial. Budapest, HungaryPresented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. 3 September 2002.
  14. The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:2413–2446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Bart BA, Ertl G, Held P, et al. Contemporary management of patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Results from the Study of Patients Intolerant of Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (SPICE) Registry. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:1182–1190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Swedberg KCONSENSUS Trial Study Group. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril survival Study. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1429–1435[Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Cohn JN, Johnson G, Ziesche S, et al. A comparison of enalapril with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:303–310[Abstract]
  18. Maggioni A, anand I, Gottlieb S, et al. Effects of valsartan on morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure not receiving ACE-inhibitors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1414–1421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hansson L, Lithell H. The study on cognition and prognosis in elderly hypertensives (SCOPE). Prague, Czech RepublicData presented at the 19th Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Hypertension and the 12th European Meeting on Hypertension — European Society of Hypertension. 23–27 June 2002.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weber, M.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Weber, M.A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?