Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Becher, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schlosser, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Becher, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schlosser, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Diagnostic impact of contrast echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease

H. Becher*,1, K. Tiemann2, S. Kuntz-Hehner2, H. Omran2 and T. Schlosser2

a Department of Cardiology, The John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, U.K.
b Herzzentrum der Universität Bonn, Medizinische Klinik and Poliklinik II, Bonn, Germany

* Correspondence: Prof Dr H. Becher, Department of Cardiology, The John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, U.K..

Abstract

The benefit of ultrasound contrast media in enhancing left ventricular (LV) border delineation has been demonstrated in numerous clinical studies. SonoVue (Bracco, Milan, Italy) and other agents have demonstrated improvement in image quality and diagnostic confidence, and their utility is now widely accepted. Contrast studies for LV opacification are best performed using contrast-specific imaging modalities. Particularly with the new low-power imaging modalities, segmentation between myocardial tissue and the LV cavity has become so clear that automatic tracing of the endocardial borders can be used, allowing user-friendly quantitative analysis of regional and global LV function. One of the strengths of contrast echocardiography is the potential to integrate optimal imaging of LV function (by analysis of wall motion) and imaging of myocardial perfusion. In clinical trials, using various contrast-specific methods, several contrast agents have been shown to provide excellent myocardial contrast effects. In two recent studies that evaluated stress-induced ischaemia, perfusion imaging by contrast echocardiography provided incremental information over conventional wall motion analysis. The techniques for deriving quantitative information from contrast echocardiographic images are still primarily used in research rather than in the clinical setting.

Conclusions Contrast echocardiography offers a comprehensive evaluation of LV function and myocardial perfusion with high spatial and temporal resolution, and has the potential to allow quantification.

Key Words: Contrast echocardiography • left ventricular function • myocardial perfusion

References

  1. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantification of the left ventricle by 2-dimensional echocardiography: American Society of Echocardiography committee on standards, subcommittee on quantification of 2-dimensional echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989;2:358–367[Medline]
  2. Hoffmann R, Lethen H, Marwick T, et al. Analysis of interinstitutional observer agreement in the interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:330–336[Abstract]
  3. Becher H, Tiemann K, Schlosser T, et al. Improvement of endocardial border delineation using tissue harmonic imaging. Echocardiography. 1998;15:511–516[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Schroder K, Agrawal R, Woller H, et al. Improvement of endocardial border delineation in suboptimal stress-echocardiograms using the new left heart contrast agent SHU 508A. Int J Card Imaging. 1994;10:45–51[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Crouse LJ, Chierif J, Hanly DE, et al. Opacification and border delineation improvement with suboptimal endocardial border definition in routine echocardiography: results of the phase III Albunex multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1494–1500[Abstract]
  6. Al-Mansour HA, Mulvagh SL, Pumper GM, et al. Usefulness of harmonic imaging for left ventricular opacification and endocardial border delineation by Optison. Am J Cardiol. 2002;: (in press)
  7. Malhora V, Nwogu J, Bondmass MD, et al. Is the technically limited echocardiographic study an endangered species? Endocardial border definition with native tissue harmonic imaging and Optison contrast: a review of 200 cases. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000;13:771–773[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Porter TR, Xie F, Kricsfeld A, Chiou A, Dabestani A. Improved endocardial border resolution during dobutamine stress echocardiography with intravenous sonicated dextrose albumin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:1440–1443[Abstract]
  9. Grayburn PA, Weiss JL, Hack TC, et al. Phase III multicenter trial comparing the efficacy of 2% dodecafluoropentane emulsion (EchoGen) and sonicated 5% human albumin (Albunex) as ultra sound contrast agents in patients with suboptimal echocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:230–236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Cohen JL, Cheirif J, Segar DS, et al. Improved left ventricular endocardial border delineation and opacification with Optison (FS069), a new echocardiographic contrast agent: results of a phase III multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:746–752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hundlcy WG, Kizilbash AM, Afridi I, et al. Administration of an intravenous perfluorocarbon contrast agent improves echocardiographic determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: comparison with Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1426–1432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Senior R, Andersson O, Caidahl K, Carlens P, et al. Enhanced left ventricular delineation with an intravenous injection of SonoVue, a new echocardiographic contrast agent: a European multicentee clinical trial. Echocardiography. 2000;13:705–711
  13. American Society of Echocardiography Task Force on Standards and Guidelines for the use of ultrasonic contrast in echocardiography. Contrast echocardiography: current and future applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000;13:331–342[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1387–1396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Yu EHC, Sloggert CE, Iwanochko M, et al. Feasability and accuracy of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. Determination by fundamental, tissue harmonic, and intravenous contrast imaging in difficult-to-image patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000;13:216–222[Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Bezante G, Schwarz KQ, Chen X, et al. Automatic LV volume and ejection fraction by contrast harmonic color Doppler imaging compared to radionuclide ventriculography. [abstract]Eur Heart J. 1999;:3628
  17. Tsujita-Kuroda Y, Zhang G, Sumita Y, et al. Validity and reproducibility of echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by acoustic quantification with tissue harmonic imaging technique. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000;13:300–305[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Porter TR, Li S, Leng J, et al. Real-time visualization of myocardial perfusion and wall thickening in human beings with intravenous ultrasonographic contrast and accelerated intermittent harmonic imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999;12:266–271[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Thanigaraj S, Schlechtman KB, Perez JE. Improved echocardiographic delineation of left ventricular thrombus with use of intravenous second-generation contrast image enhancement. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999;12:1022–1026[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Tiemann K, Lohmeier S, Kuntz S, et al. Real-time contrast echo assessment of myocardial perfusion at low emission power: first experimental and clinical results using power pulse inversion imaging. Echocardiography. 1999;16:799–809[Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Becher H, Burns PN. Handbook of Contrast Echocardiography. Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag; 2000.
  22. Marwick TH, Nemecc JJ, Pashkow FJ, et al. Accuracy and limitations of exercise echocardiography in a routine clinical setting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:74–81[Abstract]
  23. Armstrong WF, Mueller TM, Kinney EL, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion abnormalities with contrast-enhanced two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1982;66:166–173[Free Full Text]
  24. Caiati C, Montaldo C, Zedda N, et al. New noninvasive method for coronary flow reserve assessment: contrast-enhanced transthoracic harmonic echo Doppler. Circulation. 1999;99:771–778[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Wei K, Skyba DM, Fischke C, et al. Interaction between microbubbles and ultrasound: in vitro and in vivo observations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:1081–1088[Abstract]
  26. Kaul S. Myocardial contrast echocardiography, 15 years of research and development. Circulation. 1997;96:3745–3760[Free Full Text]
  27. Tei C, Sakamaki T, Shah PM, et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography: a reproducible technique for identifying regional perfusion deficits. Circulation. 1983;67:585–593[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kaul S, Kelly P, Oliner JD, et al. Assessment of regional myocardial blood flow with myocardial contrast two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;13:468–482
  29. Rovai D, Lubrano V, Vassalle C, et al. Detection of perfusion defects during coronary occlusion and myocardial reperfusion after thrombolysis by intravenous administration of the echo enhancing agent BR1. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11:169–180[Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Firschke C, Lindner JR, Wei K, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging in the setting of coronary artery stenosis and acute myocardial infarction using venous injection of a second-generation echocardiographic contrast agent. Circulation. 1997;96:959–967
  31. Dittrich HC, Bales GL, Kuvelas T, et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography in experimental coronary artery occlusion with a new intravenously administered contrast agent. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1995;8:465–474[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Lindner JR, Skyba DM, Goodman NC, et al. Changes in myocardial blood volume with graded coronary stenosis. Am J Physiology. 1997;272:H567–H575
  33. Becher H, Tiemann K, Schlief R, et al. Harmonic power Doppler contrast echocardiography: preliminary clinical results. Echocardiography. 1997;14:637–642[Web of Science][Medline]
  34. Villarraga HR, Foley DA, Aeschbacher BC, et al. Destruction of contrast microbubbles during ultrasound imaging at conventional power output. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1997;10:783–791[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  35. Porter TR, Xie F. Transient myocardial contrast after initial exposure to diagnostic ultrasound pressures with minute doses of intravenously injected microbubbles: demonstration and potential mechanisms. Circulation. 1995;92:2391–2395[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Hope Simpson D, Chin CT, Burns PN. Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents. IEEE Trans UFFC. 1999;46:372–382[Medline]
  37. Jayaweera AR, Sklenar J, Kaul S. Quantification of images obtained during myocardial contrast echocardiography. Echocardiography. 1994;11:385–396[Web of Science][Medline]
  38. Vandenberg BF, Kieso R, Fox-Eastham K, et al. Quantitation of myocardial perfusion by contrast echocardiography: analysis of contrast gray level appearance variables and intracyclic variability. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:200–206[Abstract]
  39. Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow using ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation. 1998;97:473–483[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Wei K, Le E, Bin JP, Coggins M, et al. Quantification of renal blood flow with contrast enhanced ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1135–1140[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Schlosser T, Pohl C, Veltmann C, et al. Feasibility of the flashreplenishment concept in renal tissue: which parameters affect the assessment of the contrast replenishment? Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;27:937–944[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  42. Köster J, Schlosser T, Pohl C, et al. Blood flow assessment by ultrasound-induced destruction of echocontrast agents using harmonic power Doppler imaging: which parameters determine contrast replenishment curves? Echocardiography. 2001;18:1–8[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  43. Kaul S, Senior R, Dittrich H, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease with myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with 99m Tc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 1997;96:785–792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Lindner JR, Villanueva FS, Dent JM, et al. Assessment of resting perfusion with myocardial contrast echocardiography: theoretical and practical considerations. Am Heart J. 2000;139:231–240[Web of Science][Medline]
  45. Heinle SK, Noblin J, Goree-Best P, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion by harmonic power Doppler imaging at rest and during adenosine stress. Circulation. 2000;102:55–62[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Schneider M, Arditi M, Barrau M, et al. BR1: a new ultrasonographic contrast agent based on sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubbles. Invest Radiol. 1995;30:451–457[Web of Science][Medline]
  47. Porter TR, Zie F, Kilzer K, Deligonul U. Detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities during dobutamine and adenosine stress echocardiography with transient myocardial contrast imaging after minute quantities of intravenous perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1996;9:779–786[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Porter TR, Li S, Kricsfeld D, Armbruster RW. Detection of myocardial perfusion in multiple echocardiographic windows with one intravenous injection of microbubbles using transient response second harmonic imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:791–799[Abstract]
  49. Lafitte S, Matsugata H, Peters B, et al. Comparative value of dobutamine and adenosine stress in the detection of coronary stenosis with myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation. 2001;103:2724–2730[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Shimoni S, Zoghbi WA, Xie F, et al. Real-time assessment of myocardial perfusion and wall motion during bicycle and treadmill exercise echocardiography: Comparison with single photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:741–747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Porter TR, Xie F, Silver M, et al. Real-time perfusion imaging with low mechanical index pulse inversion Doppler Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:748–753[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S, et al. Basis for detection of stenosis using venous administration of microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography: bolus or continuous infusion? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:252–260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Kuntz-Hehner S, Goenechea J, Pohl C, et al. Continuous-infusion contrast-unhanced US: in vitro studies of infusion techniques with different contrast agents. Radiology. 2001;220:647–654[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Becher, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schlosser, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Becher, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schlosser, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?