Health technology assessment of oral anticoagulation following heart valve replacement
a Federal Association of Regional Health Insurance Funds, Berlin, Germany
b Euoopean Observatory on Health Care Systems (Madrid Hub), Escuela Nacional de Sanidad, Madrid, Spain
* Correspondence: Dr Matthias Perleth, MPH, Federal Association of Regional Health Insurance Funds, Rungestr. 3-6, 10179 Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
Aims The purpose of this report is to define the role that health technology assessment (HTA; a discipline in which both health outcomes and associated economic variables are investigated) can play in determining the effects of various anticoagulation regimens after mechanical heart valve replacement.
Method and results A review of literature, including meta-analyses and primary studies of oral anticoagulation after heart valve replacement, was conducted. The review revealed that a combination of low-dose anticoagulation and antithrombotic therapy is more beneficial than oral anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy alone. The addition of high-dose antiplatelet therapy appeared to increase risk for haemorrhagic events, which was in constrast to the effect of low-dose antiplatelet therapy alone. However, the results from earlier studies are not always comparable to those of recent ones because of different reporting methods, various follow-up durations, and a tendency to report outcomes globally rather than presenting stratified analyses.
Conclusion HTA is as a tool with which to determine the most cost-effective therapy for each patient group. Various patient populations should be considered (stratified by sex, type and position of valve) within the scope of a comprehensive HTA, as well as therapeutic options. However, any HTA should be viewed critically and in light of the literature on which it is based.
Key Words: Anticoagulation biomedical heart valve replacement meta-analysis systematic review technology assessment
References
- Banta D, Oortwijn WJ. Health technology assessment and health care in the European Union. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:626635[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Banta HD, Luce BR. Health Care Technology and its Assessment. An International Perspective. Oxford, New York, Tokyo: Oxford University Press; 1993.
- Banta HD, Behney CJ, Andrulis DP. Assessing the efficacy and safety of medical technologies. Washington: Office of Technology Assessment; 1978.
- Henshall C, Oortwijn WJ, Stevens A, Granados A, Banta D. Priority setting for health technology assessment. Theoretical considerations and practical approaches. A paper produced by the Priority Setting Subgroup of the EUR-ASSESS Project. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:144185[Web of Science][Medline]
- Bitzer EM, Busse R, Kohlmann T, Lühmann D, Perleth M. Health technology assessment in the international context: where does Germany stand? For the German Scientific Working Group Technology Assessment for Health care. [in German]Z Ärztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1999;93:3338[Medline]
- Perleth M, Busse R. Health technology assessment in Germany: status, challenges, and development. Int J Health Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:412428[CrossRef]
- Vongpatanasin W, Hillis LD, Lange RA. Prosthetic heart valves. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:407416
[Free Full Text] - Bussey HI, Lyons RM. Controversies in antithrombotic therapy for patients with mechanical heart valves. Pharmacotherapy. 1998;18:451455[Web of Science][Medline]
- Bruckenberger E. Heart Report. 1999;:Bruckenberger E. includingHeart Transplantation. 2000;: Hannover
- Cannegieter SC, Rosendaal FR, Briet E. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses. Circulation. 1994;89:635641
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Cappelleri JC, Fiore LD, Brophy MT, Deykin D, Lau J. Efficacy and safety of combined anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy versus anticoagulant monotherapy after mechanical heart-valve replacement: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 1995;130:547552[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Chan WS, Anand S, Ginsberg JS. Anticoagulation of pregnant women with mechanical heart valves: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:191196
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Massel D, Little SH. Risks and benefits of adding anti-platelet therapy to warfarin among patients with prosthetic heart valves: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:569578
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Pouleur H, Buyse M. Effects of dipyridamole in combination with anticoagulant therapy on survival and thromboembolic events in patients with prosthetic heart valves. A meta-analysis of the randomized trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;110:463472
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Arom KV, Emery RW, Nicoloff DM, Petersen RJ. Anticoagulant related complications in elderly patients with St. Jude mechanical valve prostheses. J Heart Valve Dis. 1996;5:505510[Web of Science][Medline]
- Cannegieter SC, Rosendaal FR, Wintzen AR, van der Meer FJM, Vandenbroucke JP, Briet E. Optimal oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with mechanical heart valves. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1117
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Debétaz LF, Ruchat P, Hurni M, et al. St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis: an analysis of long-term outcome and prognostic factors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;113:134148
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Yamak B, Iscan Z, Mavitas B, et al. Low-dose oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy with St. Jude Medical heart valve prosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999;8:665673[Web of Science][Medline]
- Montalescot G, Polle V, Collet JP, et al. Low molecular weight heparin after mechanical heart valve replacement. Circulation. 2000;101:10831086
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Acar J, Iung B, Boissel JP, et al. AREVA: multicenter randomized comparison of low-dose versus standard-dose anticoagulation in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves. Circulation. 1996;94:21072112
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Meschengieser SS, Fondevila CG, Frontroth J, Santarelli MT, Lazzari MA. Low-intensity oral anticoagulation plus low-dose aspirin versus high-intensity oral anticoagulation alone: a ran domized trial in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;113:910916
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||