Effects of consistent atrial pacing and atrial rate stabilization - two pacing algorithms to suppress recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in brady-tachy syndrome
a Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
b Clinica Medica, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy
c Villa Tiberia, Roma, Italy
d S. Anna Hospital, Como, Italy
e Universita' Campus Biomedico, Roma, Italy
f Medtronic Inc., Roma, Italy
* Correspondence: Dr Giuseppe Boriani, MD, FESC, Institute of Cardiology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Abstract
Background and method Recently, various dedicated atrial pacing algorithms have been proposed to prevent atrial fibrillation (AF). Consistent atrial pacing (CAP; an algorithm for automatic atrial overdrive) and atrial rate stabilization (ARS; an algorithm for preventing the short-long sequences) were tested in 16 patients with brady-tachy syndrome and recurrent paroxysmal AF (
3 episodes per month).
Results In the population as a whole, pacing with CAP was associated with a significant reduction in AF burden in comparison with DDDR pacing. With regard to the effects on AF burden, 11 patients (69%) were found to benefit significantly from CAP or ARS pacing algorithms (reduction >50% in AF burden). In detail, seven patients were responders to both algorithms, two to CAP only and two to ARS only. Two patients exhibited a significant increase in AF burden with the ARS algorithm. With regard to the effects on number of mode switches per day, seven patients (44%) were found to benefit significantly from CAP or ARS pacing algorithms (reduction in mode switches per day >50%). In detail, five patients were responders to both algorithms and two to ARS only. Two patients had a significant increase in the number of mode switches per day with both CAP and ARS algorithms.
Conclusion The response to ARS and CAP algorithms is heterogeneous. In 3169% of patients with brady-tachy syndrome a significant reduction in AF burden and/or mode switch episodes can be obtained with ARS and/or CAP algorithms; however, in a few patients an increase in AF episodes and/or AF burden may occur
Key Words: Atrial fibrillation brady-tachy syndrome dual-chamber pacing pacing algorithms overdrive atrial pacing rate responsive
References
- Sutton R, Kenny RA. The natural history of sick sinus syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1986;9:11101114[CrossRef][Medline]
- Rosenqvist M, Brandt J, Schuller H. Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Am Heart J. 1988;116:1622[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Feuer JM, Shandling AH, Messenger JC. Influence of cardiac pacing mode on the long-term development of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:13761379[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Camm AJ, Katritsis D. Ventricular pacing for sick sinus syndrome: a risky business? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990;13:695699[CrossRef][Medline]
- Santini M, Alexidou G, Ansalone G, Cacciatore G, Cinri R, Turitto G. Relation of prognosis in sick sinus syndrome to age, conduction defects and modes of permanent cardiac pacing. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:729735[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Stangl K, Seitz K, Wirtzfeld A, Alt E, Blommer H. Differences between atrial single chamber pacing (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) with respect to prognosis and antiarrhyth mic effect in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990;13:20802085[Medline]
- Zanini R, Facchinetti AI, Gallo G, et al. Morbidity and mortality of patients with sinus node disease: comparative effects of atrial and ventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990;13:20762079[Medline]
- Hesselson AB, Parsonnet V, Bernstein AD, Bonavita GJ. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:15421549[Abstract]
- Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Maloney JD, et al. Chronic atrial fibrillation and stroke in paced patients with sick sinus syndrome. Relevance of clinical characteristics and pacing modalities. Circulation. 1993;88:10451053
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Andersen HR, Thuesen L, Bagger JP, et al. Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1994;344:15231528[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PEB, et al. Long-term follow up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1997;350:12101216[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Skanes AC, Krahn AD, Yee R, et al. Physiologic pacing reduces progression to chronic atrial fibrillation [abstract]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999;22:728
- Bellocci F, Spampinato A, Ricci R, et al. Antiarrhythmic benefits of dual chamber stimulation with rate-response in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and chronotropic incompetence. A prospective multicentre study. Europace. 1999;1:220225
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Murgatroyd FD, Nitzsché R, Slade AKB, et al. A new pacing algorithm for overdrive suppression of atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994;17:19661973[CrossRef][Medline]
- Ricci R, Puglisi A, Peraldo Neja C, et al. Consistent atrial pacing: can this new algorithm suppress recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation? [abstract]Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997;20:1227
- Garrigue S, Barold S, Cazeau S, et al. Prevention of atrial arrhythmias during DDD pacing by atrial overdrive. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;21:17511759[CrossRef][Medline]
- Funck RC, Capucci A, Kappenberger L, et al. Prevention of atrial arrhythmias by overdriving and the rest rate: preliminary results from the PROVE study [abstract]. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:5 (abstract suppl)
- Boriani G, Biffi M, Padeletti L, et al. Consistent atrial pacing (CAP) and atrial rate stabilisation (ARS): new algorithms to suppress recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. G Ital Cardiol. 1999;29(suppl 5):8890
- Delfaut P, Saksena S. Electrophysiologic assessment in selecting patients for multisite atrial pacing. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2000;4(suppl 1):8185
- Ricci R, Santini M, Puglisi A, et al. Impact of consistent atrial pacing algorithm on premature atrial complex number and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation recurrences in brady-tachy syn drome: a randomized prospective cross over study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2000;5:3344
- Ricci R, Puglisi A, Azzolini P, et al. Reliability of a new algorithm for automatic mode switching from DDDR to DDIR pacing mode in sinus node disease patients with chronotropic incompetence and recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996;19:17191723[CrossRef][Medline]
- Fitts SM, Hill MR, Mehra R, Gillis AM. High rate atrial tachyarrhythmia detections in implantable pulse generators: low incidence of false positive detections. The PA Clinical Trial Investigators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000;23:10801086[CrossRef][Medline]
- Seidl K, Meisel E, Van Agt E, et al. Is the high rate atrial episode diagnostic feature reliable in detecting paroxysmal episodes of atrial tachyarrhythmias? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;21:694700[CrossRef][Medline]
- Padeletti L, Porciani MC, Michelucci A, et al. Interatrial septum pacing: a new approach to prevent recurrent atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1999;3:3543[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Bailin S, Adler SW, Giudici MC, et al. Bachmann's bundle pacing for the prevention of atrial fibrillation: Initial trends in a multicenter randomized prospective study [abstract]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999;22:727[CrossRef][Medline]
- Daubert C, Mabo P, Berder V, et al. Atrial tachyarrhythmias associated with high degree interatrial conduction block: prevention by permanent atrial resyncronization. Eur J Cardiac Pacing Electrophysiol. 1994;4:3544
- Saksena S, Prakash A, Hill M, et al. Prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation with chronic dual-site right atrial pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:687694[Abstract]
- Delfaut P, Saksena S, Prakash A, Krol RB. Long-term outcome of patients with drug-refractory atrial flutter and fibrillation after single and dual-site right atrial pacing for arrhythmia prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:19001908
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Levy T, Walker S, Rochelle J, Paul V. Evaluation of biatrial pacing, right atrial pacing, and no pacing in patients with drug refractory atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:426429[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Gillis AM, Connolly SJ, Lacombe P, et al. Randomized crossover comparison of DDDR versus VDD pacing after atrioventricular junction ablation for prevention of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2000;102:736741
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Mehra R, Kaemmerer B, Fitts S, et al. Lessons learnt from multisite pacing for AF management-technical challenges. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2000;4(suppl 1):6979
- Viskin S, Golovner M, Malov N, et al. Circadian variation of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Data from almost 10 000 episodes. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:14291434
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Hoffman E, Janko S, Steinbeck G, et al. Onset scenarios of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using new diagnostic pacemakers functions [abstract]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999;23:656
- Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:659666
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Jais P, Shah DC, Haissaguerre M, et al. Atrial fibrillation: role of arrhythmogenic foci. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2000;4(suppl 1):2938
- Papageorgiou P, Anselme F, Kirchhof CJHJ, et al. Coronary sinus pacing prevents induction of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1997;96:18931898
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Savalieva I, Camm AJ. Clinical relevance of silent atrial fibrillation: prevalence, prognosis, quality of life and management. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2000;4:369382[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Azzolini, G. Critelli, V. De Giorgi, G. B. Del Giudice, G. Ibba, D. Melissano, A. Scaccia, and A. Puglisi Atrial tachyarrhythmia burden modelling by some electrophysiological parameters in pacemaker-recipient patients with Brady-Tachy syndrome Europace, July 1, 2006; 8(7): 474 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
