Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antman, E.M.
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, A.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Antman, E.M.
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, A.S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Issues in early risk stratification for UA/NSTEMI

E.M. Antman*,1, R. Corbalán2, K. Huber3 and A.S. Jaffe4

1 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
2 Catholic University Hospital, Santiago, Chile
3 University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
4 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

* Correspondence: Elliott M, Antman, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Abstract

North American and European task forces representing the ACC/AHA and the ESC have recently developed new treatment guidelines for the management of unstable angina (UA) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). At the 4th Annual Experts' Meeting of the International Cardiology Forum, workshops were held to review the new recommendations. In the discussion of risk stratification, the most debated topic was the role assigned to the cardiac-specific troponins (cTnI and cTnT). Although the importance of these indicators in an integrated risk stratification scheme was well accepted, some participants felt that they received undue emphasis in the new guidelines, and the implication that troponin status should determine use of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor and early catheterization was debated. The value of continuous versus serial ECG monitoring was also discussed, but no consensus was reached. Although many were encouraged by the data on C-reactive protein (CRP) as a prognostic indicator, it was generally agreed that it is too soon to recommend its routine measurement in ACS. Finally, risk stratification is a complex, ongoing process that is impossible to reduce to a simple treatment algorithm.

Key Words: Unstable angina • risk stratification • troponins • guidelines

References

  1. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary and recommendations: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:970–1062[Free Full Text]
  2. Bertrand ME, Simoons ML, Fox KAA, et al. Management of acute coronary syndromes: acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST segment elevation; recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology. (chair)Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1406–1432[Free Full Text]
  3. Braunwald E, Brown J, Brown L, et al. Unstable angina: diagnosis and management. Clinical practice guideline number 10. AHCPR Publication No. 94–0602. Rockville: US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1994.
  4. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJLM, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;284:835–842[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:959–969[Free Full Text]
  6. Hamm CW, Heeschen C, Goldmann B, et al. Benefit of abciximab in patients with refractory unstable angina in relation to serum troponin T levels. c7E3 Fab Antiplatelet Therapy in Unstable Refractory Angina (CAPTURE) Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1623–1629[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Morrow DA, Antman EM, Tanasijevic M, et al. Cardiac troponin I for stratification of early outcomes and the efficacy of enoxaparin in unstable angina: a TIMI-11B substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1812–1817[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease Investigators. Long-term low-molecular-mass heparin in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study. Lancet. 1999;354:701–707[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Wu AH. A comparison of cardiac troponin T and cardiac troponin I in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Coron Artery Dis. 1999;10:69–74[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Morrow DA, Rifai N, Antman EM, et al. C-reactive protein is a potent predictor of mortality independently of and in combination with troponin T in acute coronary syndromes: A TIMI 11A substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:1460–1465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Braunwald E. Unstable angina. A classification. Circulation. 1989;80:410–414[Free Full Text]
  12. deFilippi CR, Tocchi M, Parmar RJ, et al. Cardiac troponin T in chest pain unit patients without ischaemic electrocardiographic changes: angiographic correlates and long-term clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1827–1834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Jaffe AS, Ravkilde J, Roberts R, et al. It's time for a change to a troponin standard. Circulation. 2000;102:1216–1220[Free Full Text]
  14. Antman EM, Tanasijevic MJ, Thompson B, et al. Cardiacspecific troponin I levels to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1342–1349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Johnson PA, Goldman L, Sacks DB, et al. Cardiac troponin T as a marker for myocardial ischaemia in patients seen at the emergency department for acute chest pain. Am Heart J. 1999;137:1137–1144[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Jernberg T, Lindahl B, Wallentin L. ST-segment monitoring with continuous 12-lead ECG improves early risk stratification in patients with chest pain and ECG nondiagnostic of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1413–1419[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antman, E.M.
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, A.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Antman, E.M.
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, A.S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?