Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allman, K.C.
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, L.E.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Allman, K.C.
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, L.E.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease

K.C. Allman* and L.E.J. Thomson

Nuclear Cardiology Laboratory, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia

* Correspondence: Kevin C. Allman, Director of Nuclear Cardiology, Concord Hospital, Concord NSW 2139, Australia.

Abstract

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) provides important prognostic information in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD). There is well-documented evidence that patients with a normal or near-normal MPI study have a low cardiac event rate in the subsequent 1–2 years, whereas an abnormal MPI scan is indicative of increased risk (up to ten-fold) of such an event. Moreover, recent data indicate that MPI provides twice as much prognostic information compared with clinical and stress variables in these settings. Thus, MPI can be used as a ‘gateway’ to appropriate referral for invasive evaluation, enabling management to be targeted to high-risk patient groups to improve outcome.

Key Words: Myocardial perfusion imaging • coronary artery disease • prognosis

References

  1. Brown K. Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging: state of the art and new developments. J Nucl Cardiol. 1996;3:516–537[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Bodenheimer MM, Wackers FJ, Schwartz RG, Brown M. Prognostic significance of a fixed thallium defect one to six months after onset of acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina. Multicenter Myocardial Ischemia Research Group. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:1196–1200[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Brown KA. Prognostic value of cardiac imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: comparison of myocardial perfusion imaging, stress echocardiography, and position emission tomography. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:35D–41D[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Iskander S, Iskandrian AE. Risk assessment using singlephoton emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:57–62[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Fagan LFJ, Shaw L, Kong BA, Caralis DG, Wiens RD, Chairman BR. Prognostic value of exercise thallium scintigraphy in patients with good exercise tolerance and a normal or abnormal exercise electrocardiogram and suspected or confirmed coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:607–611[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Schuler BD, Kegel JG, Heo J, Segal BL, Iskandrian AS. Prognostic implications of normal exercise SPECT thallium images in patients with strongly positive exercise electrocardiograms. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:1201–1203[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Smanio PE, Watson DD, Segalla DL, Vinson EL, Smith WH, Beller GA. Value of gating of technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1687–1692[Abstract]
  8. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;97:535–543[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lauer MS, Lytle B, Pashkow F, Snader CE, Marwick TH. Prediction of death and myocardial infarction by screening with exercise-thallium testing after coronary-artery-bypass grafting. Lancet. 1998;351:615–622[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Bateman TM, O'Keefe JHJ, Williams ME. Incremental value of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in prognosis and outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1996;11:613–620[Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Gojer B, Williams KA. The role of scintigraphic perfusion imaging for predicting ischemic cardiac events in noncardiac surgery. Am J Cardiac Imaging. 1995;9:213–225[Medline]
  12. Hendel RC, Leppo JA. The value of perioperative clinical indexes and dipyridamole thallium scintigraphy for the prediction of myocardial infarction and cardiac death in patients undergoing vascular surgery. J Nucl Cardiol. 1995;2:18–25[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Eagle K, Singer DE, Brewster DC, Darling RC, Mulley AG, Boucher CA. Dipyridamole-thallium scanning in patients undergoing vascular surgery: optimizing preoperative evaluation of cardiac risk. J Am Med Assoc. 1987;257:2185–2189[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Eagle KA, Coley CM, Newell JB, et al. Combining clinical and thallium data optimizes preoperative assessment of cardiac risk before major vascular surgery. Ann Int Med. 1989;110:859–866
  15. Hilton TC, Fulmer H, Abuan T, Thompson RC, Stowers SA. Ninety-day follow-up of patients in the emergency department with chest pain who undergo initial single-photon emission computed tomographic perfusion scintigraphy with technetium 99m-labeled sestamibi. J Nucl Cardiol. 1996;3:308–311[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Varetto T, Cantalupi D, Altieri A, Orlandi C. Emergency room technetium-99m sestamibi imaging to rule out acute myocardial ischemic events in patients with nondiagnostic electrocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1804–1808[Abstract]
  17. Stowers SA, Eisenstein EL, Wackers FJTh, et al. An economic analysis of an aggressive diagnostic strategy with single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging and early exercise stress testing in emergency department patients who present with chest pain but nondiagnostic electrocardiograms: results from a randomized trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;35:17–25[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Sharir T, Germano G, Kavanagh PB, et al. Incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 1999;100:1035–1042[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, et al. Incremental prognostic value of adenosine stress myocaridal perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography and impact on subsequent management in patients with or suspected of having myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:426–433[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Kang X, Berman DS, Lewin HC, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am Heart. 1999;138:1025–1032
  21. Kaul S, Lilly DR, Gascho JA, et al. Prognostic utility of the exercise thallium-201 test in ambulatory patients with chest pain: comparison with cardiac catheterization. Circulation. 1988;77:745–758[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Pollock SG, Abbott RD, Boucher CA, Beller GA, Kaul S. Independent and incremental prognostic value of tests performed in hierarchical order to evaluate patients with sus pected coronary artery disease. Validation of models based on these tests. Circulation. 1992;85:237–248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, et al. Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification. Circulation. 1996;93:905–914[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Vanzetto G, Ormezzano O, Fagret D, Comet M, Denis B, Machecourt J. Long-term additive prognostic value of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical and exercise stress test in low to intermediate risk patients: study in 1137 patients with 6-year follow-up. Circulation. 1999;100:1521–1527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Bateman TM, O'Keefe JHJ, Dong VM, Barnhart C, Ligon RW. Coronary angiographic rates after stress single-photon emission computed tomographic scintigraphy. J Nucl Cardiol. 1995;2:217–223[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allman, K.C.
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, L.E.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Allman, K.C.
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, L.E.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?