Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neumann, F.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarzer, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Neumann, F.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarzer, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

New aspects in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes without ST-elevation: ICTUS and ISAR-COOL in perspective

Franz-Josef Neumann1,*, Adnan Kastrati2 and Guido Schwarzer3

1 Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen, Südring 15, 79189 Bad Krozingen, Germany
2 Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität, München, Germany
3 Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Medizinische Informatik, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg, Germany

* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 7633 402 8200; fax: +49 7633 402 8204. E-mail address: franz-josef.neumann{at}herzzentrum.de

For treatment of patients with high-risk acute coronary syndromes, current guidelines recommend early coronary angiography and coronary revascularization, when feasible, irrespective of the primary success of medical treatment. Moreover, the results of a randomized trial (ISAR-COOL) suggested performing revascularization as early as possible. The concept of systematic coronary angiography and revascularization in high-risk acute coronary syndromes has been challenged recently by another randomized study (ICTUS) demonstrating an excess of myocardial infarction during 1-year follow-up with a routine-invasive strategy when compared with a selectively invasive strategy. This review intends to put the new trial results in perspective with evidence from previous studies.

Key Words: Acute coronary syndromes • Percutaneous catheter intervention • Guidelines • Treatment strategies • Timing • Meta-analysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.