Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lechat, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lechat, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The evolution of heart failure management over recent decades: from CONSENSUS to CIBIS

Philippe Lechat*

Pharmacology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, 47 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France

* Corresponding author. Tel: +33 1 42 16 16 82; fax: +33 1 42 16 16 88. E-mail address: philippe.lechat{at}psl.ap-hop-paris.fr

The treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF) has changed greatly during the last two decades, moving from therapy based on a haemodynamic model to treatments targeting the neuroendocrine systems and the remodelling process. The use of inotropic agents to compensate for the loss of contractile force resulted only in neutral or deleterious effects on long-term prognosis. Vasodilator therapy was then introduced with the objective of improving haemodynamics and reducing cardiac load. The first vasodilator studied, hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate, was rapidly superseded by the ACE-inhibitors, the first neurohormonal antagonists to demonstrate mortality reduction in CHF, and to inhibit left ventricular (LV) remodelling. During the 1980s, ACE-inhibitors were shown to benefit patients in all NYHA classes including patients with asymptomatic LV dysfunction. The concept of neurohormonal blockade was then extended to the sympathetic nervous system. Although the first evidence of a beneficial effect of beta-blockade dates back as early as 1975, it was not until the 1990s that major randomized controlled trials showed a mortality reduction of approximately one-third when beta-blockers were given in addition to standard therapy with ACE-inhibitors and diuretics. In recent years, the aldosterone antagonists have also emerged as beneficial treatments for severe CHF. However, other neurohormonal antagonists have proved disappointing. Most recently, cardiac resynchronization therapy, with or without an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, has also been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in selected patients. With the range of drugs and devices now available, the challenge now is to find the optimal combination for each patient.

Key Words: Chronic heart failure • ACE-inhibitor • Beta-blocker • Inotropic agents • Diuretics • Digitalis • Cardiac resynchronization therapy • Randomized controlled trials


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.