Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Follath, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Follath, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Beta-blockade today: the gap between evidence and practice

Ferenc Follath*

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, Office HAL 16, D 2, Raemistrasse 100, CH 8091 Zürich, Switzerland

* Corresponding author. Tel: +41 44 255 9305; fax: +41 44 255 4554. E-mail address: ferenc.follath{at}usz.ch

Current European Society of Cardiology guidelines for chronic heart failure (CHF) recommend the use of beta-blockers in all symptomatic patients with systolic dysfunction. Beta-blockers reduce CHF mortality by >30% and also reduce hospitalizations. Given at appropriate doses, they are generally well tolerated, even in the elderly. However, two large European surveys [IMPROVEMENT in primary care and Euro Heart Failure Survey (EURO-HF) in hospitalized patients] show that beta-blockers are used in only 34–37% of patients, with a wide variation between countries. The frequency of beta-blocker prescription in patients ≥75 years of age is <20%. A recent analysis of EURO-HF showed that, even among CHF patients who met the criteria for the landmark trials, without comorbidities or other risk factors, beta-blockers are used in <50% of cases. General practitioners and internists prescribe beta-blockers less frequently than cardiologists. This difference may be partly due to the fact that patients treated by non-specialists tend to be older and have more comorbidities. Another problem is the fear of side effects with beta-blockers. This is often due to lack of experience (particularly among primary care physicians), as in the past beta-blockers were considered contraindicated in CHF. Frequently cited reasons for not prescribing beta-blockers are advanced age, severe symptoms, and comorbidities (e.g. chronic lung disease, diabetes). In fact, most problems can be avoided if beta-blockers are started at a very low dose and titrated up step by step to the maximum tolerated dose. Mortality benefits are achieved even at doses much lower than the targets used in clinical trials. The CIBIS III results should now help to eliminate most of the doubts regarding the efficacy and tolerability of beta-blockade, even in the elderly patient population.

Key Words: Beta-blockers • Randomized controlled trials • Surveys • Clinical practice • Chronic heart failure


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.