Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Funck-Brentano, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Funck-Brentano, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Beta-blockade in CHF: from contraindication to indication

Christian Funck-Brentano1,2,3,*

1 Pierre et Marie Curie University, Department of Pharmacology, Paris, F-75012, France
2 AP-HP, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Paris, F-75012, France
3 INSERM–AP-HP, Clinical Investigation Center, CIC-9304, Hôpital St-Antoine, 184, rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, Paris, F-75012, France

* Corresponding author. Tel: +33 1 49 28 22 00; fax: +33 1 49 28 28 13. E-mail address: christian.funck-brentano{at}sat.aphp.fr

When beta-blockers were first introduced, they were initially tested in chronic heart failure (CHF) at full doses and without slow upward titration. In this context, they rapidly became contraindicated in CHF because of their negative inotropic properties. Later, however, it became clear that sympathetic activation was closely associated with CHF and that the degree of activation was, to some extent, proportional to the severity of left ventricular dysfunction. This suggested that beta-blockers should be beneficial in CHF, but in practice they were still avoided, despite a small number of encouraging early uncontrolled studies. It was not until the 1990s that large randomized controlled trials provided unequivocal proof of the mortality and morbidity benefits of beta-blockade with bisoprolol, controlled-release metoprolol succinate, and carvedilol. In the landmark studies, the beta-blocker, given on top of standard treatment, consistently reduced the all-cause mortality by 34–35%, with very good tolerability. Beta-blockade also reduced cardiovascular mortality, sudden cardiac death, and death due to progression of heart failure, reduced hospitalizations (all-cause, cardiovascular, and worsening heart failure), and improved NYHA functional class. All the landmark trials were performed with a very low initial dose of the beta-blocker (compared with the dose used in patients without CHF), with a slow individualized upward titration towards full beta-blockade. Such a progressive and individualized method of administration appears to be critical for the transformation of beta-blockers from contraindicated agents in CHF to agents that are not only indicated, but considered a critical component of standard treatment.

Key Words: Dose-response • Side-effects • Bisoprolol • Carvedilol • Metoprolol • Dose titration


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C.-H. Tseng
It Is Time We Ended the Myth of Insulin as an Atherogenic Hormone--Reply
Arch Intern Med, April 23, 2007; 167(8): 859 - 859.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.