Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dudek, D.
Right arrow Articles by Dubiel, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dudek, D.
Right arrow Articles by Dubiel, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The role of thrombectomy and embolic protection devices

Dariusz Dudek*, Waldemar Mielecki, Artur Dziewierz, Jacek Legutko and Jacek S. Dubiel

2nd Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 17, 31-501 Krakow, Poland

* Corresponding author. Tel: +48 124247181; fax: +48 124247184. E-mail address: mcdudek{at}cyf-kr.edu.pl

In recent years, it has been demonstrated that restoration of normal coronary flow in the infarct-related artery is not equivalent to the restoration of myocardial perfusion through cardiac microcirculation. Among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), distal embolization and slow-flow and no-flow phenomenon occur in ~30% of patients. In these patients, PCI results are less satisfactory, with lower thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) or myocardial blush grade (MBG) values, lower rate of a complete resolution of ST-segment elevation, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, and poorer long-term outcome. Studies investigating the usefulness of thrombectomy systems in STEMI showed a similar proportion of patients with TIMI (flow grade 3) in the infarct-related artery in thrombectomy treated patients and control groups. Some small studies with thrombectomy systems or distal protection devices showed encouraging results with preventing slow-flow, no-reflow, and distal embolization, as measured by improved myocardial perfusion by angiography and improved ST-segment elevation resolution after PCI. Large, multi-centre studies did not confirm clinical benefit. New European Society of Cardiology PCI guidelines do not give definitive recommendations regarding the use of embolic protection devices for this group of patients. More randomized trials are needed. However, thrombectomy may be very effective in the situation of large thrombus bulk when present after first balloon catheter inflation. It could be also potentially effective with easy to use thrombectomy system for replacing balloon pre-dilatation before stenting, if studies could prove clinical benefit of such concept for primary PCI.

Key Words: Primary PCI • Distal protection • Thrombectomy • Myocardial perfusion


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.