Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borer, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Borer, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: permissions@oupjournals.org

Heart rate slowing by If inhibition: therapeutic utility from clinical trials

Jeffrey S. Borer*

Division of Cardiovascular Pathophysiology and The Howard Gilman Institute for Valvular Heart Diseases, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, The New York-Presbyterian Hospital—Weill Cornell Medical Center, 47 East 88th Street, New York, NY 10128-1152, USA

* Corresponding author. E-mail address: canadad45{at}aol.com

Myocardial ischaemia results from an excess of myocardial oxygen demand in comparison with available supply. Heart rate is a primary determinant of oxygen demand and thus its reduction is a well-accepted strategy for the prevention of angina pectoris, a highly debilitating symptom of coronary artery disease, but does not usually presage imminent myocardial infarction or death. Currently available drugs that reduce heart rate are commonly associated with adverse effects, which may limit their use in many patients. Therefore, it is important to develop additional alternatives with different pharmacological effects. The inward sodium–potassium-mediated If current of sinoatrial node cell membranes (functionally absent elsewhere in the myocardium) modulates sinoatrial diastolic depolarization rate and, thus, heart rate. Heart rate reduction can be achieved by modulating or blocking this current. Ivabradine, a highly selective If current inhibitor, can reduce heart rate by clinically useful decrements at doses that are devoid of other direct cardiovascular effects and generally are well tolerated. The only dose-related adverse effects are visual (phosphenes, stroboscopic effect, and non-typical blurred vision), which occur in 2–15% of patients receiving 2.5–10 mg orally twice daily, usually are no more than mildly bothersome, are fully reversible spontaneously or with cessation of therapy, and are not associated with retinal damage. Clinical trials involving more than 5000 patients indicate that ivabradine as monotherapy is effective in preventing angina. Effects are seen at doses as low as 2.5 mg twice daily. Preliminary data suggest that when employed at 7.5 or 10 mg twice daily, angina prevention with ivabradine is equivalent to that achieved with atenolol 100 mg daily and with amlodipine 10 mg daily.

Key Words: Coronary artery disease • Angina pectoris • Cardiovascular pharmacology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
M. Tendera
Editorial: If inhibition: from pure heart reduction to treatment of stable angina
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., September 1, 2005; 7(suppl_H): H3 - H6.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.