Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, F.D.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, F.D.R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The European Society of Cardiology

Guidelines and management of global risk: the European perspective

F.D.R. Hobbs*

Department of Primary Care and General Practice, School of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK

* Correspondence: Prof. F.D.R. Hobbs, Division of Primary Care, Public and Occupational Health, Department of Primary Care and General Practice, Primary Care Clinical Sciences Building, School of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. Fax: +44-121-414-6571
f.d.r.hobbs{at}bham.ac.uk

Abstract

The anticipated rise in the prevalence of coronary heart disease (CHD) over forthcoming years throughout the world, including Europe, will place a significant burden on the healthcare system. Consequently, a major challenge that faces the medical profession is to improve the introduction of effective preventive strategies into routine clinical practice in order to blunt the scale of this epidemic. Current levels of risk factor management in patients with established cardiovascular disease are poor, and the implementation of primary preventive strategies to reduce the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in high-risk patients is even worse. The principal objective of clinical guidelines, such as those for the prevention of CHD issued by the Joint European Societies, is to improve the quality of patient care and health outcomes. However, the development of good guidelines by professional organizations does not guarantee their use in clinical practice. Surveys indicate that the most successful guidelines, in terms of implementation in general practice, are based on robust scientific evidence, are explicit in their recommendations, are uncontroversial, and demand minimal disruption to existing working procedures and workloads.

Key Words: Coronary heart disease • Europe • Guidelines • Primary prevention • Risk factors • Secondary prevention


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.