Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gasparini, M
Right arrow Articles by Gronda, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gasparini, M
Right arrow Articles by Gronda, E
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: technical aspects

M Gasparini*, M Mantica, P Galimberti, U La Marchesina, M Manglavacchi, F Faletra and E Gronda

Electrophyisiology and Pacing Unit, Instituto Hunnanitas, Rozzano (Milano, Italy

* Correspondence: Maurizio Gasparini, Electrophyisiology and Pacing Unit, Instituto Clinico Humanitas, Via Manzoni, 56, IT-20089 Rozzano (Milano).

Abstract

Biventricular pacing results in significant haemodynamic improvements in most patients with chronic heart failure and intra-ventricular conduction delay, especially those with left bundle branch block. A growing body of experience indicates that the pacing site and the choice of atrioventricular/intraventricular delay are crucial to short-term improvement in left ventricular (LV) function. In patients with left bundle branch block, the mid-lateral and mid-postero-lateral wall of the left ventricle have been identified as the regions at which the latest activation occurs. Thus, they present the most effective pacing sites on the left ventricle. The importance of an appropriately timed atrial contraction for ventricular loading is well established, because prolongation of the atrioventricular interval (common in patients with chronic heart failure) provokes a reduction in the LV active filling phase, a shortening in passive diastolic filling and onset of a ventriculo-atrial gradient, thus initiating diastolic mitral regurgitation. Atrioventricular delay optimization can limit these deleterious haemodynamic effects, although the influence of atrioventricular delay appears to be less important than proper choice of LV pacing site. The latest generation of biventricular pacing devices are equipped with two separate channels for the right ventricular and LV leads, thus allowing the interventricular timing of pacing to be varied, obtaining haemodynamic benefits even from a non-optimal LV site.

Key Words: Biventricular pacing • left bundle branch block • mitral valve regurgitation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.