Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boriani, G.
Right arrow Articles by Branzi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Boriani, G.
Right arrow Articles by Branzi, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Effects of consistent atrial pacing and atrial rate stabilization - two pacing algorithms to suppress recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in brady-tachy syndrome

G. Boriani*,1, M. Biffi1, L. Padeletti2, A. Sparnpinato3, G. Luca Botto4, C. Pignalberi5, A. Grammatico6, D.A. Hettrick6, F. De Seta6 and A. Branzi1

a Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
b Clinica Medica, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy
c Villa Tiberia, Roma, Italy
d S. Anna Hospital, Como, Italy
e Universita' Campus Biomedico, Roma, Italy
f Medtronic Inc., Roma, Italy

* Correspondence: Dr Giuseppe Boriani, MD, FESC, Institute of Cardiology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.

Abstract

Background and method Recently, various dedicated atrial pacing algorithms have been proposed to prevent atrial fibrillation (AF). Consistent atrial pacing (CAP; an algorithm for automatic atrial overdrive) and atrial rate stabilization (ARS; an algorithm for preventing the ‘short-long’ sequences) were tested in 16 patients with brady-tachy syndrome and recurrent paroxysmal AF (≥3 episodes per month).

Results In the population as a whole, pacing with CAP was associated with a significant reduction in AF burden in comparison with DDDR pacing. With regard to the effects on AF burden, 11 patients (69%) were found to benefit significantly from CAP or ARS pacing algorithms (reduction >50% in AF burden). In detail, seven patients were responders to both algorithms, two to CAP only and two to ARS only. Two patients exhibited a significant increase in AF burden with the ARS algorithm. With regard to the effects on number of mode switches per day, seven patients (44%) were found to benefit significantly from CAP or ARS pacing algorithms (reduction in mode switches per day >50%). In detail, five patients were responders to both algorithms and two to ARS only. Two patients had a significant increase in the number of mode switches per day with both CAP and ARS algorithms.

Conclusion The response to ARS and CAP algorithms is heterogeneous. In 31–69% of patients with brady-tachy syndrome a significant reduction in AF burden and/or mode switch episodes can be obtained with ARS and/or CAP algorithms; however, in a few patients an increase in AF episodes and/or AF burden may occur

Key Words: Atrial fibrillation • brady-tachy syndrome • dual-chamber pacing • pacing algorithms • overdrive atrial pacing • rate responsive


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
P. Azzolini, G. Critelli, V. De Giorgi, G. B. Del Giudice, G. Ibba, D. Melissano, A. Scaccia, and A. Puglisi
Atrial tachyarrhythmia burden modelling by some electrophysiological parameters in pacemaker-recipient patients with Brady-Tachy syndrome
Europace, July 1, 2006; 8(7): 474 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.