Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamm, C. W.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hamm, C. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Current practice and limitations of dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome

Christian W. Hamm*

Kerckhoff Heart Center, Benekestr. 2-8, Bad Nauheim 61231, Germany

* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 6032 996 2202, Fax: +49 6032 996 2298. E-mail address: c.hamm{at}kerckhoff-klinik.de

Prevention and treatment of all phases of cardiovascular disease remains a challenge. Antiplatelet therapy has a paramount place in the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), which often precipitates cardiovascular death. Current guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology recommend that all patients should be treated with dual aspirin/clopidogrel antiplatelet therapy during the acute phase, and for up to 12 months in instances of non-ST-elevation ACS. Nonetheless, recurrent cardiovascular events still occur in patients who receive guideline-recommended antiplatelet therapy, and therefore there is room to improve upon the degree and timing of platelet inhibition. The variability of responsiveness to aspirin and clopidogrel among patients who experience ACS has been the focus of intense investigation. Interindividual variation in the degree of platelet inhibition achieved after administration of clopidogrel is marked, and an associated clinically inadequate response occurs in up to 30% of patients (depending upon the platelet aggregation measurement used). In addition, the optimal interval between clopidogrel administration and maximal drug effect is more than 15 h. Development of antiplatelet agents which have more consistent and more rapid action could therefore bring significant advantages over current antiplatelet regimens.

Key Words: Acute coronary syndromes • Antiplatelet therapy • Thienopyridines • Clopidogrel • P2Y12 receptor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.