Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montalescot, G.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Montalescot, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Benefits for specific subpopulations in TRITON-TIMI 38

Gilles Montalescot*

Institut de Cardiologie, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France

* Corresponding author. Tel: +33 1 42 16 30 06/07, Fax: +33 1 42 16 29 31; E-mail address: gilles.montalescot{at}psl.aphp.fr

Dual-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and thienopyridines can prevent ischaemic events associated with acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention. The Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TRITON-TIMI) 38 trial demonstrated that prasugrel, a novel and potent thienopyridine, can reduce ischaemic events compared with clopidogrel therapy, but at the cost of increased bleeding events in some high-risk patients. This review aims to highlight the driving force behind the reductions in ischaemic events in the overall TRITON-TIMI 38 population, and present the efficacy and safety profiles of prasugrel in important TRITON-TIMI 38 sub-populations [patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at inclusion, diabetes, and stent placement], compared with clopidogrel. In the overall TRITON-TIMI 38 population, the reduction in the combined primary efficacy endpoint of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or non-fatal stroke with prasugrel, compared with clopidogrel, was driven by a reduction in the rate of MI. In the sub-population analyses, prasugrel significantly reduced the rate of the primary endpoint compared with clopidogrel, again primarily through a reduction in MI. Of note, prasugrel did not increase TIMI major non-coronary artery bypass graft bleeding in patients with STEMI or diabetes, relative to clopidogrel. These data suggest that in high-risk patients, the safety of prasugrel is comparable to that of clopidogrel.

Key Words: TRITON-TIMI 38 • Prasugrel • Myocardial infarction • ST-elevation myocardial infarction • Diabetes mellitus • Stent


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.