Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, S. R.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, S. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Clinical benefit and practical use of fondaparinux in the invasive management of patients with acute coronary syndromes

Shamir R. Mehta*

Interventional Cardiology, Hamilton Health Sciences, General Division, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L6K 1B8

* Corresponding author. Tel: +1 905 521 2631; fax: +1 905 527 4463. E-mail address: smehta{at}mcmaster.ca

In patients with high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), an invasive management strategy has been found to be superior to a conservative strategy. In the real world, ~50% of patients treated with an invasive strategy require a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure, whereas the remaining 40–50% are treated medically and a small proportion (<10%) undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Therefore, anti-thrombotic drugs need to be both safe and effective when started early in a broad range of patients with ACS, regardless of ultimate revascularization status. Fondaparinux is the first selective inhibitor of factor Xa approved for use across the whole spectrum of patients with ACS. In patients with NSTE-ACS in the OASIS-5 study, upstream treatment with fondaparinux was found to have superior net clinical benefit compared with enoxaparin in patients undergoing PCI. Fondaparinux reduced death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major bleeding by 22% compared with enoxaparin (P = 0.004). Even in those undergoing early PCI (i.e. within the first 24 h), there was a 24% relative risk reduction in favour of fondaparinux (P = 0.035). The main benefit was a large 54% reduction in major bleeding (P < 0.001), which was achieved with near identical rates of ischaemic events (6.3 vs. 6.2%). Catheter thrombus occurred with very low incidence in both the fondaparinux and the enoxaparin groups and was virtually eliminated in both groups with adjunctive unfractionated heparin (UFH) administered in the catheterization laboratory just prior to PCI. In the fondaparinux group, the mean dose of UFH was about 50 U/kg. On the basis of these data and the overall results of the OASIS-5 trial, the experts of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and of the European Society of Cardiology gave fondaparinux a class I recommendation for use in patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing invasive strategy. In practice, fondaparinux is easy to use (fixed dose of 2.5 mg once daily for all patients) and is associated with improved patient outcomes, including those patients managed with an invasive strategy.

Key Words: Acute coronary syndromes • Anticoagulant • Fondaparinux • Low-molecular-weight heparins • Percutaneous coronary intervention • Unfractionated heparin


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.